The debate over whether effective blockchain government regulation can serve as a catalyst for growth and societal progress – or whether the market should be left to chart its course – was at the heart of a dynamic panel discussion at the London Blockchain Conference. Held under the theme “Government’s Role in Fostering Innovation,” the panel tackled one of the most pressing questions facing the blockchain industry today: How can regulation create fertile ground for growth while preserving the ethos of decentralisation?
The session brought together a distinguished group of leaders from law, governance, and finance, including:
Educating Policymakers: The Foundation for Blockchain Adoption
Alun Cairns MP opened the session with an honest admission: “Very few MPs can confidently define blockchain.” The problem, he pointed out, is that blockchain is too often conflated with cryptocurrency or misunderstood as a tool for illicit activity, rather than a foundation for digital transformation.
Cairns urged for a greater distinction between blockchain and cryptocurrency, noting that blockchain in governance could offer efficiencies in everything from healthcare records to public procurement. He emphasised the importance of bridging this knowledge gap, arguing that politicians must champion policies that demonstrate blockchain’s potential to revolutionise public services.
“People don’t need to understand the mechanics or technology behind something to appreciate its benefits,” he explained.
He called on fellow legislators to champion blockchain innovation, stressing that better understanding among policymakers is the first step toward progressive legislation that could unlock transformative benefits for both public and private sectors.
Blockchain Governance Across Geographies
Tom Spiller expanded the conversation to a global context. He noted that blockchain adoption varies significantly across countries, depending on their specific economic and regulatory environments.
For instance, nations like Argentina and Turkey are adopting blockchain as a workaround for economic instability or market inefficiencies. Others, like Ukraine, have embraced it for digital identity and public service delivery, while regions with more developed financial systems often see it through the lens of speculative finance or wealth management.
Spiller argued that such diversity calls for customised blockchain regulation rather than a one-size-fits-all model.
MiCA and the Push Toward Regulatory Clarity
The introduction of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation in the European Union was cited as a major step forward in creating a clear legal framework. MiCA outlines licensing requirements for digital asset service providers and sets rules for stablecoin issuers, including stringent proof-of-funds obligations and mandatory white papers.
Despite early opposition – particularly from those who feared that such regulation would contradict the ethos of decentralised finance (DeFi) – recent events such as the FTX collapse have reshaped the regulatory conversation. As trust in digital asset firms waned, calls for blockchain governance that emphasises transparency and accountability grew louder.
Dean Armstrong KC argued that well-crafted regulation does not have to stifle innovation. Instead, it can offer a secure and predictable environment that encourages responsible growth.
Learning From City-Level Innovation: Mayor Hillary Schieve
One of the session’s most compelling contributions came from Mayor Hillary Schieve, who shared Reno’s journey in embracing blockchain. From piloting blockchain-based municipal voting to digitising city records, Reno’s experimentation stands as a model for local-level blockchain integration.
She explained that trust-building was central to the process. “We had to show people what blockchain could do, not just talk about it,” she said. By focusing on real-world use cases – not speculation or hype – Reno earned credibility among both its citizens and the broader blockchain community.
Mayor Schieve’s comments aligned with the London Blockchain Conference Finance Summit, which emphasised education, trust, and transparency as the cornerstones for successful blockchain implementation in finance and governance.
Final Thoughts: Aligning Policy With Progress
In their closing remarks, panellists agreed that blockchain regulation must walk a tightrope: clear enough to protect users and investors, but flexible enough to allow the technology to evolve.
Lavan Thasarathakumar summarised it aptly: “Regulation must be proportional, risk-sensitive, and innovation-enabling. That’s the only way we can deliver on blockchain’s promise.”
As blockchain use cases mature – whether in supply chain transparency, digital identity, or tokenised finance – governments must evolve in parallel. The future of blockchain will not be written by developers alone but shaped by collaboration between industry pioneers, legal experts, and forward-thinking governments.
Join the Future of Blockchain Today
The London Blockchain Conference is not just a stage for thought leadership – it’s a launchpad for action. Register now to be part of the movement transforming blockchain from a buzzword into a force for public good.
Be there. Be informed. Be the change.
